Supplementary material 2
Gabriel S. Santos 
Geospatial distribution of protected areas is presented here, with point size proportional to threatened flora diversity. Color-coding distinguishes areas based on management plan implementation, while pop-ups provide site-specific data on jurisdiction and projected richness.
An interactive data visualization is provided
| Column | Description |
|---|---|
| UC_NAME | Protected area name |
| ID_UC | A unique ID number is assigned for each protected area polygon. |
| IUCN_CAT | IUCN category |
| ESF_ADM | Protected area jurisdiction |
| PLA_MAN | Yes/No for Presence/Absence of management plans |
| Richness: | Observed richness of threatened flora specie |
| Richness_pred | Best model prediction of threatened flora species |
| Lat | Protected area’s centroid latitude |
| Long | Protected area’s centroid longitude |
Published paper
Santos GS, Moreira DO, Loss AC, Garbin ML. 2024. Management plans bias the number of threatened species in protected areas: a study case with flora species in the Atlantic Forest. Biodiversity and Conservation 33:843–858. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-024-02796-y.